top of page

Feminist Theogony – The Invention and Subversion of the Divine

  • תמונת הסופר/ת: Yoav Levin
    Yoav Levin
  • לפני 3 ימים
  • זמן קריאה 4 דקות

From Revelation to Projection



Theogony—literally the “birth of the gods”—is not merely the construction of mythic genealogies, but a metaphysical articulation of cosmic order. Traditional theogonies such as Hesiod’s, the Kabbalistic Sefirot, or the emanations of the Gnostic Pleroma, presented divine figures not as mere characters but as existential principles. They emerged from mystery and revelation, providing symbols through which mortals could relate to the ineffable, to that which transcends them.



Feminist theogony, however, often reverses this trajectory. Rather than gods and goddesses being encountered through awe and reverence, they are manufactured from ideological projection. The divine is no longer discovered in cosmic revelation—it is reconstructed to reflect human politics. Goddesses are not eternal archetypes but avatars of megalomania, hedonism, and hate. They become political myths projected into the metaphysical domain.



This transformation has already been diagnosed by figures like Nathanson and Young, who argued that modern feminist mythology projects grievances into cosmology, turning divinity into a mirror of historical resentment and subversive will. It is the shift from divine revelation to ideological invention.



The Goddess as Ideological Icon



In ancient mythologies, goddesses such as Isis, Inanna, or Sophia embodied cosmic paradoxes—mediators between life and death, chaos and order, matter and spirit. They were not one-dimensional figures of ego trip, but embodiments of metaphysical tension. Yet in modern feminist reinterpretations, these complexities are flattened. The goddess is recast as a symbol of unchecked power, supremacy, and erotic indulgence. She becomes less of a divine mystery and more of a social justice warrior and political activist in the sky.



The spiritual thus collapses into the political. The divine is no longer a source of transcendence but a platform for political struggle. The result is metaphysical idolatry: the sacred is domesticated, reduced to ideological affirmation. Goddess worship becomes a vehicle for identity politics, reproductive control, and narcissistic self-stylization.



The divine is no longer that which transforms the self—it is that which affirms it. It becomes an echo chamber for ideological desire. Rather than being revealed, the goddess is manufactured. Rather than descending from eternity, she is summoned by the ego.



From Polytheistic Fragmentation to Monotheistic Integration



The historical movement from polytheism to monotheism was not merely a religious shift, but a metaphysical one. Ancient people often assigned different phenomena—rain, fertility, war, love—to distinct gods. But the emergence of monotheism, particularly in the Hebrew tradition, integrated these male and female deities into attributes or acts of a singular divine source. As Umberto (David Moshe) Cassuto writes, the Israelites did not merely eliminate the gods of Canaanite cosmology—they subsumed them.



Cassuto details how metaphors such as “Rider of the Clouds,” originally attributed to Baal, were retained in Hebrew scripture but reinterpreted within the monotheistic framework. The various names and acts of the gods were no longer signs of separate beings, but facets of a unified divine agency, male and female, Animus and Anima - the androgynus. The polytheistic gods were demoted to metaphors, natural forces, or in some cases, demonized remnants of theological memory. This was not oppression—it was ontological integration.



Even goddess figures like Tabitti, or folk entities like Baba Yaga, underwent similar transformations. Yet while many male deities were demonized or discarded, some female figures remained objects of cultural admiration, whether as the indwelling essence of god - mother Mary or the Shechina, or even as demonic forces. This reflects not patriarchal oppression but the preservation of the sacred feminine archetypes even within religious transitions. Feminist theogony misunderstands this historical and metaphysical process, reversing it not toward liberation but toward regression—re-fragmenting divinity into identity cults and politics.



From Sacred Hierarchy to Demotic Reversal



Traditional theogonies upheld sacred hierarchy. Even in the most rebellious cosmologies—such as Gnostic or Kabbalistic systems—there remained a longing for reintegration, a sacred telos. Feminist theology often dismantles this structure entirely. Hierarchy itself is seen as oppressive, divine asymmetry as patriarchal, and order as violence.



This produces a flattened theology where divinity is fragmented, scattered and de-unified—everyone is divine, and everything is sacred. This isn’t mysticism; it is spiritual narcissism. The image of God is replaced with a thousand images of the self. Theology becomes autobiography. Myth is replaced by confession. The cosmos is no longer a theater of transcendence—it becomes the ship of fools for identity affirmation.



Reversing the Archetypes



A defining feature of feminist theogony is the subversion of traditional archetypes. Figures like Sophia, once symbols of divine self-exile and salvation, are reinterpreted not as seekers of reintegration but as rebels against hierarchy. Lilith, once a demonic archetype of unredeemed desire, becomes a heroine of sexual outsourcing and consummerism. The Virgin Mary is attacked as a tool of patriarchal purity, while Kali is exalted as a goddess of erotic rage and destructive freedom.



Yet these revisions often strip the figures of their spiritual tension. Lilith becomes a mascot of manipulation. Sophia becomes an epistemological saboteur. The sacred is not elevated—it is weaponized. The inversion becomes a dogma in itself—heresy becomes orthodoxy reversed, not transcended.



Theogony Without Theos



Ultimately, feminist theogony becomes a theogony without Theos—a birth of gods without God. There is no transcendent ground, no Logos, no ultimate source. The pantheon that emerges is not of divine figures, but of ideological con artists. They reflect not eternity, but the anxieties of the present. They are not voices of mystery but echoes of power.



This is not the restoration of the sacred feminine. It is its simulation. It is not the return of mythic meaning—it is the commodification of myth for political utility. What remains is not wisdom, but noise. Not divinity, but projection.




"Where structure collapses, thought rebuilds.

Peering through the veils of power and illusion.

Telegon Project: A new cartography of consciousness"


 
 
 

Comments


​FOLLOW ME

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Google+ Social Icon
bottom of page