top of page

Feminist Mythos - The female-Centric Feminist Counter-Creation Myths!

  • תמונת הסופר/ת: Yoav Levin
    Yoav Levin
  • לפני 3 ימים
  • זמן קריאה 4 דקות

The synthesis of the following two frameworks creates a profound examination of feminist mythos, ethos, pathos, and logos within a larger cultural and ontological matrix. By integrating the concepts of Gynocentric Repository Consciousness (GRC) and Gynocentric Mythos, Ethos, Pathos Axis (GEMPA), we can explore how the feminist reconfiguration of these classical rhetorical elements is not merely a rhetorical shift but a metaphysical inversion—a reshaping of both individual and collective consciousness.




The feminist mythos, as I'll be outlining here, serves to recode cosmic origins into a gendered narrative of oppression and resistance. By framing mythos in the context of feminist ideology, ancient stories are reinterpreted not as revealing deep metaphysical truths but as vehicles for political subversion. These myths of struggle—pitting the oppressed woman against a fabricated patriarchal villain—are woven into the cultural fabric of modern society.



This framework supports the idea that feminist mythos operates as a subterranean operating system, embedding its ideological structures within the cultural memory—where these myths become indistinguishable from reality. Feminist mythology is not just a reimagining of sacred narratives but a weaponization of memory: what was once a divine or cosmic archetype is now recast as a political archetype—the victim-heroine - a feminu)ist deconatruction and reinterpretation of the damsel in distress motive - the toxic male, and the sacred female pain become the bedrock of modern moral order.



The Gynocentric Counter-Creation Myths (GCM) are both a cosmogony and a theosophy—as they provide a narrative framework that replaces transcendence with immanent female experience. These myths frame the feminine as the center of all existence, from which the world and the moral order spring.




Feminist Ethos - Gynocentric Normativity (The Gynonormativity and the Gynonormative-Ethos)



The feminist ethos, under this lens, is the moral fabric of the feminist worldview. It no longer arises from virtue or self-discipline but from a sense of moral superiority rooted in victimhood and grievance. The Gyno-Ethos operates not through formal institutions of power, such as law or religion, but through the informal networks of social and familial relations. Authority is built upon emotional authenticity and personal suffering.



This ethos mirrors the shift from a transcendental, sacrificial morality to one of affirmation. The virtuous person is not one who rises above suffering but one who is most authentically attuned to her pain, her emotional experience, and her struggle. Moral authority is validated through intersectional suffering rather than through any transcendental virtues. This produces a cultural normativity: what is good and right is what aligns with the lived experience of oppression and victimhood, making it an immanent and self-reinforcing system. Ethos thus becomes the moral code of the oppressed, with the language of justice acting as a moral compass.




Feminist Pathos -The Gynocentric Emotional Conditioning



Pathos in traditional metaphysical or religious discourse speaks to a divine longing, an emotional connection with the transcendent or the sacred. Feminist pathos, however, weaponizes emotions—specifically grievance and trauma—to create emotional conditioning. It embeds in individuals a sense of historical and personal suffering that becomes not only central to identity formation but also to moral authority.



In the feminist framework, suffering is not transformative—it is preserved, even glorified. Feminist pathos elevates grievance to a state of sacred victimhood, where pain and trauma are never to be overcome but rather perpetually affirmed and re-experienced. It is not merely about empathy but about using empathy as a tool for emotional domination. The emotional landscape becomes politicized through mechanisms like cancel culture, guilt rituals, and the ongoing performance of victimhood.



The Gynocentric Repository Consciousness (GRC) imprints these emotional narratives into the very subconscious and cultural memory—so deeply ingrained that individuals feel these truths before they even think about them. Pathos becomes the primary lens through which reality is interpreted, with female moral superiority and male guilt forming the central emotional dynamics. This emotional imprinting shapes behaviors, reinforcing the power dynamics central to the modern feminist welfare state.



Feminist Logos - The Gynocentric Pseudo-Logos (Null-Logos)



Logos, traditionally understood as the rational, logical structure that governs the universe, is in feminist thought displaced. Feminist logos does not seek universal truths or objective reasoning but instead embraces subjectivity, identity politics, and the dismantling of reason itself. The feminist approach to logos becomes a tool for validating personal experience over objective truth. It seeks to anihilate logic and to replace it with pathos and ignorance.



Rather than aligning with a higher, transcendent rational order, feminist logos becomes an instrument of ideological control and emotional manipulation—it serves the purpose of legitimizing and justifying the gynocentric myths and emotional narratives. Feminist logos becomes relativistic, constructed through critical theory, intersectionality, and deconstruction—where truth is fluid and situated within identity rather than any universal framework. Science becomes politics, and rational discourse is reduced to language games that support the underlying ideological narrative.



Conclusion: The Total Inversion of Sacred Structure



By examining feminist mythos, ethos, pathos, and logos through the lens of Gynocentric Repository Consciousness and Gynocentric Normativity, we see the total inversion of traditional sacred structures. In the traditional metaphysical worldview, logos, ethos, pathos, and mythos are oriented toward the transcendent, the divine, and the eternal. But in the feminist reworking, these dimensions are inverted to enshrine the self as divine, collapsing the sacred hierarchy into a self-referential loop.



Logos becomes narrative politics, ethos becomes emotional validation, pathos becomes grievance, and mythos becomes political symbolism. The gynocentric system replaces the vertical axis of transcendence with a spiral of self-reinforcement, creating a closed loop where the self is sanctified as the highest authority. In this system, truth is not something to be discovered but something to be projected onto the world through the lens of identity politics and emotional authority.



This inversion not only reshapes the individual's relationship to truth and virtue but also reconfigures society's metaphysical base, making feminist mythos, ethos, pathos, and logos central to the formation of modern ideological control. The Liberal Fascist Democtatorship thrives within this structure, as gynocentric mythology provides the root from which cultural norms, political ideologies, and social behaviors all emerge.



"Where structure collapses, thought rebuilds.

Peering through the veils of power and illusion.

Telegon Project: A new cartography of consciousness"

 
 
 

Comments


​FOLLOW ME

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Google+ Social Icon
bottom of page