The Birth of Gynocentric Culture: Midwifery, Evolution, and the Origins of Gynocentric Immanence

The origins of gynocentric immanence may not only be metaphysical or symbolic in nature, but also grounded in evolutionary necessity. A critical transition occurred approximately 5 million years ago, when early hominins developed bipedalism—a shift that radically altered human physiology, particularly female anatomy. As Ian Tattersall (1999), curator at the American Museum of Natural History, has argued, upright posture constrained the shape of the pelvis, making childbirth more difficult and dangerous. This evolutionary change catalyzed the emergence of midwifery, a social innovation that transformed reproductive biology into a collective, social, and later spiritual event.

I. The Evolutionary Roots of Gynocentric Immanence

Unlike most mammals, human birth typically cannot occur in isolation. The physical demands of labor, complicated by the increasing size of the neonate’s cranium (due to encephalization), required assistance. This necessity gave rise to midwives, whose roles were not merely practical but inherently cultural and symbolic. Over generations, female knowledge networks emerged around pregnancy, childbirth, and child-rearing—making women the custodians of early medical, herbal, ritualistic, and spiritual knowledge.

This evolutionarily driven social structure gave rise to what we may call the biological and anthropological basis of gynocentric immanence (GCI-I). Midwifery established a model in which the female need (childbirth) became a collective concern, elevating the feminine to the ontological and epistemological center of the emerging social order. As such, the female experience of reproduction became hypostatized—that is, reified and sacralized as a central axis of social meaning.

II. From Midwife to Shaman: The Spiritualization of Female Knowledge

The experiential wisdom of midwives—who not only bore life but aided others in bearing it—naturally evolved into a proto-shamanic function. These women became custodians of life and death, bleeding and birthing, pain and healing. Their knowledge extended into the spiritual and the metaphysical; they became interpreters of omens, dreamers of signs, and vessels of the sacred feminine. The line from midwife to priestess to shaman is neither incidental nor merely cultural—it is ontologically rooted in the female body as the locus of mystery, transformation, and continuity.

This process infused the metaphysical archetypes associated with the feminine—goddess worship, Earth-mother figures, fertility deities—with practical evolutionary significance. What began in the birth-hut became encoded into myths, rituals, and religions.

III. Immanence, Solipsism, and Gynonormativity: The Derivative Structures

The rise of midwifery culture marked the beginning of internalized gynocentrism: not only was the outer world structured around the female, but the inner world of individuals, too, became organized through a gynocentric solipsism—a perception of the feminine as the primary filter of reality. This solipsism, when projected onto the epistemological level, evolves into gynonormativity—the internal standard through which values, ethics, and truth are assessed by alignment with the feminine hypostasis.

Thus, we arrive at a philosophical and metaphysical cycle:

Biological Gynocentrism (the need for midwifery)

→ Social Gynocentrism (female knowledge networks)

→ Spiritual Gynocentrism (female shamanism and hypostasis)

→ Epistemological Gynocentrism (gynonormativity)

IV. The Gynocentric Continuum

The unique human dependence on midwifery, compared to most other mammals, is itself symbolic. While animals like elephants, dolphins, and bats have demonstrated proto-midwifery behaviors, only humans have ritualized it, preserved it in myth, and transformed it into sacred knowledge. This lends weight to the argument that human society emerged through the centrality of the female experience, not simply biologically, but socially, psychologically, and metaphysically.

From this, we can assert that gynocentric immanence is not only a metaphysical proposition but also an evolutionary outcome—a natural byproduct of the human condition. In this light, gynocentrism is the condition of human meaning-making. All deviations—be they patriarchal or egalitarian—are either negations, adaptations, or compensations for this original structure.

Conclusion: From Birth to Hypostasis

In sum, the evolutionary need for midwifery planted the seeds for female-centered cultural development, making the female archetype the first site of knowledge, authority, and metaphysical mystery. The spiritualization of midwifery led to the gynocentric hypostasis—a reality in which the feminine saturates both the world (immanence) and the self (solipsism). This evolutionary origin explains not only the symbolic richness of femininity, but also the ontological primacy it acquired throughout human history, philosophy, and mythology.

This framework may serve as the ground zero for understanding why gynocentric cultures and ideologies have endured and re-emerged, not as constructs of modernity but as echoes of deep evolutionary memory.

"Where structure collapses, thought rebuilds.

Peering through the veils of power and illusion.

Telegon Project: A new cartography of consciousness"