How Feminist Dismal and Pseudo-Science Works!

The feminist pseudo research and dismal science regarding domestic as well as sexual violence, based on false perception of reality, is colored by feelings of misandry and men hate, thus constitute also a logical fallacy which is a type of "Petitio Principii" that in return also uses and combine false methodology to pervert and manipulate empirical data to get the desired conclusion. All of the feminist researches on domestic as well as sexual violence including victimization and perpetration are invalid because of these three power components.

1. False Epistemology! 2. Wrong methodology! 3. Distorted logic: "Petitio Principii"

In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question, Petitio Principii is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning: an argument that requires that the desired conclusion be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden, or at least not easily apparent. In feminist methodology the hidden and the not apparent turn outright to perverted and distorted. Furthermore, in modern vernacular usage, however, begging the question is often used to mean "raising the question" or "suggesting the question". Sometimes it is confused with "dodging the question", an attempt to avoid it. The phrase begging the question originated in the 16th century as a mistranslation of the Latin Petitio Principii, which actually translates to "assuming the initial point".

Those three components are a typical methodological pattern for feminist research in the academy especially in the field of domestic as well as sexual violence. As such, the feminists have turned the academy into a hotbed of stupidity and ignorance. Most prominent of all, as I said, are the faculties in the field of domestic and sexual violence. From there this was widened to all studies, which are marked by anti-academic, anti-scientific and anti-intellectual approaches including sociology, anthropology, primatology and above all the feminist women's and gender studies. Over the years, with the help of syntax alone, this feminist poison has been able to turn thinking people into ones who've lost their brains and mind. The trick, successfully used over and over again, is to pervert and change the order between facts and conclusions. We, the fascist ignorant, according to those enlightened feminists and leftists, believe in our simplistic naivety, that everything especially conclusions must be based on facts. This is for the thoughtless and the faint.

In the feminist academy, the conclusion is always known in advance, and the role of facts is to validate it. To understand the destruction of the brain that exists in such circular arguments, Petitio Principii, of the desired assumption, we must regain our brain and critical thinking. But since the academy has done away with the thinking tools and intellectual requirements, that's why this feminist lunacy works there great. On the other hand, it is very easy to eliminate these arguments by showing that the conclusions that have been fitted to it do not have the principle of refutation. Only that the first stage must be done outside of the academy and not within it. Therefore, in the feminist frame of anti-logic, anti-academic, anti-scientific and anti-intellectual approach, the claims and conclusions are always self-evident. If the facts support them, they are a confirmation. If the facts disprove them, it is "even more of a confirmation", they simply have to distort the empirical findings with the help of erroneous epistemology and flawed methodology.

Want another example?

1. A man is rapist:

A. If he rapes a woman!

B. If the overwhelming majority of men do not rape, all men are still rapists because they belong to the group!

C. All white, privileged, men are wicked of a special breed because, in addition to white women, they do not rape the majority of black and other women of color (or so they are even more racist than we previously thought)

A possibility that men don't rape en masse, that the majority of white men (and women) aren't racist or that men are moral beings who won't rape any women no matter the circumstances, never cross their mind. Again, there is no situation in which facts will refute the "conclusion." Petitio Principii. There is no possibility in which there is reciprocal violence and gender symmetry between men and women. So, no amount of facts and empirical data will change it. If necessary the data and facts will be changed to the desired outcome. Petitio Principii.The problem is that policy-leading politicians become brainwashed morons instead of educated intellectuals by reading these feminist pseudo and dismal studies and adopting misandrist policy based on mental feminist retardation that promotes men's hatred. They then lead policies that are guided by paradoxical and colossal stupidity. Our society cannot afford to fund the spread of this brain destruction in the purchase of feminist stupidity and hatred. And since this academy has always justified women's violence against men, anti-masculine policies, aimed at destroying men and boys, including their exploitation and discrimination, as long as the state and society cooperate with them, they are all part of its misandry and evil culture!



  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Google+ Social Icon

© 2023 by Samanta Jonse. Proudly created with