Gynocentric Axiology – The Value Core of Feminist and Gynonormative Thought

Definition and Core Concept

Gynocentric Axiology (from Greek ἀξία, axia, "value, worth"; λογία, -logia; Greek and γυνή, "female" – Latin centrum, "centered") refers to the value-centered worldview and evaluative framework in which female experiences, needs, desires, and perspectives are deemed central, superior, or more morally and socially urgent than those of men. It represents the axiological heart of gynocentrism and feminist moral epistemology, intertwining with ethics, aesthetics, and ontological primacy. This framework undergirds the gynocentric social order, operating both consciously and unconsciously within individuals, institutions, and culture at large.

Gynocentric Axiology, as a philosophical and ideological construct, finds expression in both formal and informal value systems. It functions overtly in institutions and legal-political rhetoric (e.g., women's rights discourse) and covertly through cultural norms, moral expectations, and emotional narratives embedded in upbringing and education. This axiology is not just a passive framework—it is an active force shaping epistemology, behavior, and social engineering.

Integration with Gynocentric Ethics and Aesthetics

Gynocentric ethics concerns itself with what is "right" and "good" behavior in the context of female priorities. It often manifests through prescriptive norms directed at men (e.g., "real men do X for women") and women (e.g., the celebration of motherhood or female suffering as noble). Gynocentric aesthetics, on the other hand, deals with what is considered beautiful or desirable—often through a feminine-coded lens that elevates female form, emotion, and vulnerability as idealized objects of beauty, reverence, or protection.

Together, these feed into a wider axiology that determines worth across all areas of life. Gynocentric Axiology is the value container into which ethical norms and aesthetic standards are poured. The female becomes not only the center of moral concern but also the touchstone for what is valued in life—beauty, goodness, worthiness, suffering, and even truth itself. This triadic system (axiology-ethics-aesthetics) forms a meta-value structure underpinning feminist teleology and feminist deontology, often expressed through values rather than logic or universal principle.

Ontological and Epistemological Dimensions

Gynocentric Axiology is rooted in a gynonormative ontology—where womanhood is considered the default axis of humanity, and manhood is seen in relational or oppositional terms (i.e., as protector, aggressor, or servant). From this base, a gynocentric epistemology arises: knowledge and truth are filtered through lived female experience as inherently more valid, authentic, or urgent.

This axiology informs the way value judgments are made about nearly every field of human endeavor:

In ethics: What is right is often what benefits women.

In aesthetics: What is beautiful is often what pleases or flatters the female gaze or idealizes feminine form.

In politics: What is just is often what advances women’s rights or addresses female suffering.

Domains of Application and Social Conditioning

Gynocentric Axiology pervades the micro and macro levels of society. It governs personal relationships, institutional expectations, and cultural production.

Motherhood and Early Education: The mother is often the first axiological authority, instilling notions of what is good, valuable, and desirable from a female-centered viewpoint. This initiates the child into gynocentric value systems before formal education even begins.

Marriage and Romance: Women evaluate men through a moral-aesthetic framework—who is worthy of love, commitment, or reproduction.

Academia and Media: Academic feminism formalizes gynocentric values into theories and policies, while media glamorizes and popularizes them.

Cultural Symbols and Myths: Stories such as "Beauty and the Beast" encapsulate Cross-Gynocentric Axiology—beauty is female, beast is male, value is measured in terms of female transformation or validation.

Formal vs. Informal Gynocentric Axiology

Formal Gynocentric Axiology: Found in feminist theory, academic curricula, human rights law, and institutional policy—where values are explicitly structured around the needs and rights of women.

Informal Gynocentric Axiology: Found in social norms, relationship expectations, pop culture, and everyday moral judgments—where values implicitly prioritize female well-being, autonomy, and moral standing.

Gynocentric Axiological Thinking in Practice

Axiological thinking is ever-present and often unconscious. Phrases such as “success,” “failure,” “progress,” or “regression” are interpreted in light of how they serve or hinder female interests. This results in:

Moral judgments that favor women regardless of context.

Selective moral outrage or empathy.

Value hierarchies that place female needs above male needs in politics, health, education, and media.

Sexonomics and Selection

Gynocentric Axiology also governs sexual and reproductive values. Through both cultural scripting and biological framing, women are seen as selectors and gatekeepers of reproduction, imbuing them with both aesthetic and moral authority over sex, love, and family. This intersects with evolutionary narratives and feminist social norms to create a complex matrix of value production around female choice.

Conclusion: The Value Core of the LFD

Gynocentric Axiology is not merely a side effect of feminism—it is one of its deepest ideological cores. It is the axiomatic foundation of the Liberal Fascist Democtatorship's moral structure. By embedding value systems that center female perspectives, desires, and needs at every level of life, gynocentric axiology sustains a moral, aesthetic, and political order that is inherently biased yet masked as universal. This value regime is neither neutral nor incidental—it is engineered, transmitted, and reinforced as the implicit good of modernity.

Understanding this axiology is essential for deconstructing the superstructure of control within the LFD and exposing the ideological nature of what society considers "valuable." It reveals how meaning itself has been restructured through a gynocentric lens, redefining worth, goodness, and beauty from the inside out.

"Where structure collapses, thought rebuilds.

Peering through the veils of power and illusion.

Telegon Project: A new cartography of consciousness"