top of page

Feminist Deontology and Teleology within Gynocentric Axiology: A CGT-Based Deconstruction

This short essay deepens the previous analysis by situating feminist ethics, aesthetics, and axiology within the broader moral architectures of feminist deontology and feminist teleology, and reveals how these are undergirded by CGT’s layered ontology. It demonstrates how feminist moral systems are not just political ideologies but affective-mythic constructions rooted in gynocentric valuation systems.



---


1. Feminist Deontology as Gynocentric Moral Absolutism


Feminist deontology refers to a normative system where moral duties are constructed not from universal rational maxims (as in Kant), but from gendered ethical imperatives grounded in female subjectivity, trauma, and care obligations. Key characteristics include:


Duty to empathy, validation, and emotional labor


Obligation to center female experience and pain


Moral asymmetry between oppressor and victim (often male vs. female)



CGT correlation:

At the Protoconscious Embodiment and Onto-karmic levels, this deontology emerges from deep affective asymmetries:


The moral axis is maternalized—the Mother as moral originator, protector, or judge.


Moral duties are affectively encoded—not rationally abstracted, but emotionally loaded imperatives (e.g., “believe women,” “emotional labor is unpaid moral work”).


Men are often coded as ontological debtors—bound to perform, atone, and validate women’s moral superiority.



Thus, feminist deontology is a form of moral absolutism derived from gynocentric trauma-imprints—personal pain becomes ethical law.



---


2. Feminist Teleology as Gynocentric Eschatology and Directionality


Feminist teleology refers to the implicit or explicit end-goals of feminist ethics and politics. This can include:


The demanf for emancipation through the expansion of absolute female power, female agency with no regard to others, and female centered visibility


Restoration of alleged historical justice through social inversion


Utopian visions of a care-based, emotionally intelligent society



CGT correlation:

At the Narrative-Mythic and Ideo-conscious layers, feminist teleology draws from eschatological tropes:


Female emancipation as historical redemption (from male domination)


The “end of patriarchy” as a moral-spiritual telos


The future as a space of female-coded justice and restoration



Feminist teleology is not pragmatic but mythic-futural—it projects historical trauma and affective grievance into redemptive narratives of future moral order. Often, this involves metaphysical moral binaries: the male past as evil, the female future as good.



---


3. Integration with Gynocentric Axiology


When viewed axio-genealogically, feminist deontology and teleology are not isolated frameworks but dynamic outputs of a gynocentric axiological engine:


Feminist ethics provides the code of conduct: what is “right” for women.


Feminist deontology installs it as sacred law: what must be done for women.


Feminist teleology imagines its fulfillment: what the world should become for women.


Feminist aesthetics renders it emotionally and symbolically powerful.


Gynocentric axiology defines it as the only moral compass, displacing other value systems.



All these layers combine to form a moral totality where feminine subjectivity becomes the ethical axis of the universe—not through rational argument, but through embodied, narrative, and cultural saturation.



---


4. CGT as Deconstructive Tool


The Cognitive Gynocentric Telegony (CGT) model reveals that these feminist moral architectures are:


Not metaphysically objective, but historically contingent and emotionally conditioned


Not rationally deduced, but mythically and affectively constructed


Not universal in value, but gynocentrically encoded and asymmetrically applied



CGT exposes feminist deontology and teleology as ethical mythologies—functional, politically effective, and emotionally potent, but grounded in affective trauma loops, mother-coded moralism, and proto-relational scripts, not rational coherence or universal ethics.



---


Conclusion: Axiological Hegemony as Feminist Moral Order


In sum, feminist deontology and teleology are integral expressions of a gynocentric axiology that operates across all domains of culture and moral reasoning. They transform private affective experiences into public ethical demands and political visions, creating a system where:


The female becomes the telos of morality


The male becomes its perpetual debtor


Reality becomes morally legible only through female-coded value systems



Thus, feminist moral philosophy must be understood not only as a social theory but as a value-based metaphysics rooted in a complex interplay of trauma, narrative, embodiment, and cultural reproduction. CGT allows us to unearth and critique this structure without dismissing the lived experiences behind it—but without surrendering to its claims of universality either.



"Where structure collapses, thought rebuilds. Peering through the veils of power and illusion. Telegon Project: A new cartography of consciousness"

 
 
 

Comments


​FOLLOW ME

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Google+ Social Icon
bottom of page